Trucking Organizations Issue Responses to the Fatal FL Turnpike Crash
Trucking groups respond to the fatal Florida Turnpike crash: the OOIDA warns on CDL rules and ATA stresses training and safety standards for truck drivers.
Florida Turnpike Crash Sparks Trucking Industry Responses
Background of the Fatal Trucking Crash
A deadly accident on Florida’s Turnpike has led to strong reactions from national trucking groups. Reports say a truck driver made an illegal U-turn across the southbound lanes. This caused a collision that killed three people.
Troopers identified the truck driver as Harjinder Singh, who is now facing three counts of vehicular homicide. Authorities discovered Singh entered the U.S. illegally in 2018 and later obtained a CDL in California.
The driver was arrested at the scene and taken into custody. Charges were filed soon after. The crash has renewed concerns about trucking safety, CDL rules, and the qualifications of truck drivers across the United States.
OOIDA Calls for Suspension of Non-Domiciled CDL Rules in Trucking
The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) issued a strong response after the crash. In a letter to U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, the group urged an immediate suspension of states’ authority to issue non-domiciled commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) for interstate trucking.
OOIDA said the suspension should stay in place until USDOT completes its nationwide review of CDL rules. The group added that CDLs should only be issued to qualified truck drivers.
OOIDA praised recent federal actions that reinstated English proficiency violations into the Out-of-Service Criteria. The association said it strongly supports requiring CDL testing to be done only in English. It also supports requiring truck drivers to prove they can read critical road signs before they are licensed.
The letter also asked USDOT to look closely at how non-domiciled drivers are recruited and paid. OOIDA said regulators should also review the safety records of carriers that employ these drivers. The group questioned the need for the non-domiciled CDL program at all. They noted that trucking currently has excess capacity, which limits opportunities for U.S.-domiciled truck drivers.
OOIDA Urges Stronger Enforcement and Carrier Oversight
OOIDA also urged DOT to require a full 10-year review of an applicant’s driving history. This review should cover all vehicle types and all jurisdictions. The group noted that U.S. drivers already face this level of scrutiny. “No one should be getting a CDL if they have an unsafe driving history,” the group said.
The letter called for tougher enforcement of carrier responsibilities under federal safety rules. OOIDA said USDOT must crack down on carriers that fail to check their drivers’ accident and violation histories. Allowing unsafe operators on the road, the group said, puts everyone in danger.
OOIDA also raised concerns about how easily new carriers can enter the industry. The group said USDOT’s New Entrant Safety Audit is now often done online. This makes the process more about completing paperwork than proving safe operations. According to OOIDA, this weak system allows “chameleon carriers” with past violations to reenter trucking under new names.
The letter ended by recognizing safety improvements already made under Secretary Duffy. OOIDA said more must still be done to keep unqualified drivers and unsafe carriers off U.S. highways. The association pledged to continue working with DOT to improve safety in trucking and to make the profession sustainable for professional truck drivers.
ATA Responds With Focus on CDL Rules and Enforcement
The American Trucking Associations (ATA) also issued a strong statement. The group called the crash “a horrific tragedy that should never have happened.” ATA said the driver’s disregard for highway safety and the rules of the road showed he should not have been behind the wheel.
ATA pointed to early reports from the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. Those reports said the driver may have been in the U.S. illegally. ATA said this raised questions about how he obtained a commercial driver’s license. The group stated that the state of California must answer for how such CDL rules were applied in this case.
ATA also highlighted the importance of federal action. The group said the Trump Administration’s nationwide audits of CDL issuances are critical. ATA added that enforcing English language proficiency is equally important. They stressed that English fluency is a basic requirement for truck drivers operating in interstate commerce.
The statement also emphasized the need for strong entry-level driver training standards. ATA said such standards are key to preventing tragedies like this one. But they warned that fraudulent and non-compliant training providers are still fast-tracking CDL applicants with little or no training.
ATA reminded regulators of its April letter to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). In that letter, the group highlighted the problem of unqualified training programs. ATA urged FMCSA to act quickly to remove unlicensed and unqualified training providers from the registry.
ATA concluded that stronger enforcement of CDL rules is needed. The group said these steps will protect truck drivers, safeguard the public, and restore trust in the trucking industry.
Diverging Views in the Trucking Industry
OOIDA and ATA both agree that the Florida crash shows serious safety problems in trucking. But they offer very different solutions.
OOIDA wants to suspend non-domiciled CDL rules. The group believes foreign nationals should not be able to obtain licenses without meeting the same standards as U.S. drivers. They argue that stricter limits on who can qualify for a CDL are necessary to protect highways and truck drivers.
ATA, however, focused on enforcement. The group highlighted fraudulent and non-compliant training providers that put unqualified drivers on the road. ATA called for tougher oversight, nationwide audits, and stronger English proficiency requirements. They said these steps would strengthen trucking safety and rebuild public confidence.
This split shows a larger debate within trucking. OOIDA pushes for restricting access to CDLs. ATA stresses the need for better enforcement of existing rules and removal of bad actors from the system.
Broader Implications for Trucking
The Florida crash has become a turning point in the safety debate. Questions about CDL rules, driver qualifications, and oversight are again at the center of trucking policy. Federal officials may now face growing pressure to act.
Some groups want tighter controls on non-domiciled CDLs. Others argue for stronger training standards and tougher enforcement of existing regulations.
Whatever happens, the outcome could reshape the future of the U.S. trucking workforce. For now, OOIDA and ATA agree on one point. Safety must remain the trucking industry’s highest priority, even as debate continues over the best path forward.
